Image Credit: Unsplash
Key Takeaways
- Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granted final approval to Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement, the largest copyright payout on record in the U.S.
- The deal sets roughly $3,000 per work across more than 480,000 works and requires Anthropic to destroy the pirated files it had stored.
- The judge rejected authors’ objections that the sum was too low, while some who opted out are pursuing separate lawsuits.
A federal judge granted final approval on Monday to Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement with a group of authors, closing out what is widely described as the largest copyright payout on record in the United States. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin overruled objections from authors who argued the sum was too low. The order resolves a case that began in 2024 over Anthropic’s use of pirated books to train its Claude chatbot.
How The Case Reached A Settlement
Authors filed suit against Anthropic in 2024, alleging the company used pirated copies of their books to train Claude. Now-retired Judge William Alsup ruled last June that training an AI model on books qualifies as fair use under copyright law. He found separately, however, that Anthropic violated the law by storing more than 7 million pirated books.
Martinez-Olguin took over the case after Alsup’s retirement and signed the final settlement order on Monday, closing out a process that had run for more than a year since the parties first reached an agreement.
“We reached this settlement in 2025, after the court’s landmark ruling that training AI on books is fair use under copyright law, which remains the law today,” Anthropic deputy general counsel Aparna Sridhar said in a statement.
What The Payout Covers
The settlement, filed with the court, sets a per-work payment of roughly $3,000 across more than 480,000 works. Martinez-Olguin noted the figure is four times the $750 statutory minimum for standard copyright infringement, a comparison she cited in explaining why the total payout reflected a substantial recovery for the class.
As of April, claimants had filed for 440,490 works, or 91.3% of the total list covered by the deal. Beyond the cash payment, the settlement requires Anthropic to destroy the pirated book files it had downloaded and stored.
Judge Rejects Objections Over Settlement Size
A group of authors objected to the final approval, arguing the $1.5 billion figure undervalued their claims relative to what a trial might have produced. Martinez-Olguin rejected those objections, writing that the complaints were “not grounded in a realistic assessment of the overall risks and rewards of a trial.”
Her ruling leaves the per-work payment structure and the destruction requirement intact as approved. Anthropic still faces active litigation over the same underlying conduct from those who opted out of the settlement and are pursuing separate lawsuits.
First Major AI Copyright Case To Settle
The case is among the first major U.S. AI copyright disputes between authors and an AI developer to reach a settled resolution rather than an ongoing trial or appeal. Other publishers and rights holders have filed similar suits against AI companies over training data, and those cases remain unresolved.
Alsup’s fair-use ruling remains distinct from the storage violation that produced the monetary settlement. Both elements now form the operative legal record in the case following Monday’s final order. Alsup’s fair-use ruling does not bind other courts, though it may be cited in other pending AI copyright suits.
Some authors who opted out of the settlement are continuing separate lawsuits against Anthropic over the same conduct.
