Image credit: Unsplash
Key Takeaways
- Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal and CPO Faryar Shirzad publicly backed the CLARITY Act, pushing back against a Wall Street Journal column that framed privately issued digital dollars as a systemic risk.
- Shirzad argued that GENIUS-framework stablecoins are safer than commercial banks because they are legally required to hold one-to-one reserves and are barred from lending, leverage, and fractional reserves.
- With only two legislative windows remaining before midterms, the Senate must reconcile its CLARITY bill with the House-passed version before November for the legislation to advance.
Coinbase’s top legal and policy executives have publicly endorsed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act and pushed back against a Wall Street Journal column questioning whether privately issued stablecoins pose systemic risk to the U.S. economy. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal and Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad both argued that payment stablecoins operating under the GENIUS Act’s reserve requirements carry less structural risk than commercial banks.
Grewal and Shirzad Respond to Wall Street Journal Column on Stablecoin Risk
Grewal and Shirzad issued separate statements defending payment stablecoins against the column’s framing. Grewal rejected the premise that private issuance creates inherent risk.
“Money that’s ‘private’ isn’t any more inherently risky than healthcare or security or transportation that’s private. It’s how you manage that risk, as well as access and oversight that matters. CLARITY promotes all this,” Grewal stated.
Shirzad supported that position in a longer Coinbase policy response, noting that approximately 90% of M2 already consists of privately issued instruments, including commercial bank deposits and money market fund shares, according to Shirzad.
Shirzad Points to GENIUS Framework’s Ban on Lending and Fractional Reserves
Under the GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, payment stablecoin issuers are required to hold cash and short-dated U.S. Treasuries as one-to-one reserves and are prohibited from making loans, using leverage, or operating with fractional reserves, according to the legislation.
Shirzad cited those provisions in arguing that bank-style supervision would mischaracterize the actual risk profile of stablecoin issuers, since commercial banks lend, transform maturities, and operate at roughly 10-to-1 leverage, according to Shirzad, while stablecoin issuers are legally barred from doing any of those things.
He also pointed to monthly reserve attestations and real-time on-chain visibility as transparency features absent from traditional bank deposits.
Senate Has Two Legislative Windows Left Before Midterm Deadline
Grewal’s and Shirzad’s endorsements of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act arrive as the Senate Banking Committee advances the bill toward a full floor vote. The Senate would need to reconcile its version with the House-passed bill before November for the legislation to advance in the current congressional session.
Shirzad argued that GENIUS-compliant stablecoins extend U.S. dollar reach globally and offer reserve transparency that traditional bank deposits do not provide, he said. Both Grewal and Shirzad said the CLARITY Act is what is needed to establish those standards, according to their respective statements.
Shirzad described the GENIUS framework’s reserve and transparency requirements as the foundation for what he called a more accountable and accessible dollar-denominated payment system.
