Ethereum’s Identity Crisis Deepens as Senior Exits Fuel “Brain Drain” Fears

Image Credit: Shutterstock

At least eight senior researchers and contributors have left the Ethereum Foundation this year, with five departures in May alone. Without explaining the departures or announcing replacements, the Foundation has turned individual resignations into a larger reckoning over the organization’s leadership, strategy, and alignment with the network’s economic interests.

Departures Hit Every Layer of the Protocol Organization

The 2026 exit list now includes Carl Beek, Julian Ma, Barnabe Monnot, Tim Beiko, Trent Van Epps, Alex Stokes, Josh (an operations and writing lead), and former co-executive director Tomasz Stanczak. Dankrad Feist, a prominent researcher, left earlier to join Tempo. All three of the Foundation’s Protocol Cluster leads have departed.

“Situation: all three EF protocol leads have left,” community member Banteg posted on X alongside a screenshot of the Foundation’s org chart with the departed names struck through.

The Foundation disclosed in a May 11 blog post that Monnot and Beiko were leaving and that Stokes was taking a sabbatical. It named Will Corcoran, Kev Wedderburn, and Fredrik as the new Protocol Cluster leads. Beyond that, no detailed explanation for the wave of exits has been offered.

Feist Says EF Is Misaligned and Urges a New ETH-Backed Institution

On Thursday, Feist published what amounted to a structural critique of the Foundation itself. He argued that the EF’s governance is fundamentally misaligned with the economic interests of the Ethereum network.

“The way to save Ethereum is for the community to create an organization that’s economically aligned with Ethereum and accountable to it,” Feist wrote on X.

Feist noted that the Foundation now controls “less than 0.1% of all ETH” and receives no direct flow of staking or fee revenue from the network. He proposed creating a new institution with a $1 billion treasury funded in part through staking revenues, overseen by a board with explicit incentives tied to ETH’s value.

Shin Says Ethereum’s “Original Sin” Was Ignoring Tokenomics

Crypto journalist Laura Shin, host of the Unchained podcast, framed the problem as a failure of economic strategy rather than just governance.

“I think Ethereum’s original sin was not considering tokenomics with every move it made from Dencun on,”

Shin wrote on X, referring to the March 2024 upgrade that dramatically reduced transaction fees on Layer 2 networks.

The “ultrasound money” thesis, the idea that ETH would become increasingly scarce through fee burns, had become central to Ethereum’s investment narrative. Critics argue the scaling roadmap weakened that dynamic without offering a replacement narrative for token holders.

“When the main offering becomes ideology/communism and money/tokenomics/capitalism are overlooked, the peasants are going to revolt,” Shin wrote. “Ethereum’s unwillingness to stop the brain drain will only benefit its competitors, or spawn new ones.”

Exits Follow Buterin’s 2025 Shift Toward a Research-and-Grants EF

The departures sit on top of a reorganization Vitalik Buterin initiated in 2025 that repositioned the Ethereum Foundation away from top-down roadmap ownership and toward a focused research and grants hub. Execution was pushed outward to independent client teams and external organizations.

That restructuring was designed to decentralize development, but the rapid succession of exits has raised questions about whether it also created the conditions for a talent exodus. DeFi researcher Ignas captured the community’s frustration on X:

“What’s happening at the EF? How many not public? And why? Stopped believing in Ethereum? Pay is low and competitors paying more? Or just tired? Would love to know the REAL reasons.”

The most pressing issue is whether the departures impact the delivery of Ethereum’s upcoming network upgrade, the Glamsterdam upgrade. The new Protocol Cluster leads have inherited the roadmap. How cleanly they absorb the work left behind will determine whether the exits register as planned decentralization or as institutional memory loss.